New Civilization News: Be afraid, be very afraid |
Category: Systems Thinking 19 comments 27 Jun 2010 @ 05:02 by Harry Parshall @68.116.112.66 : Collective social intelligenceDr Bruce Lipton has suggested modeling our social systems on biological processes. He says the human body is a community of 50 trillion cells living in harmony. If we could figure out how to translate the same processes into human social interactions we could have a system that really works. 27 Jun 2010 @ 08:04 by susannahbe : Nice writing! I agree with Merlin, Ming, this is inspired and inspiring. I can also see things changing through the communication opportunities provided by the internet and social networking sites like twitter, for the most part information can no longer be controlled which changes the power structure and gives autonomy back to the individual, now the task is to get him to take it! A lot of the reason people don't want it, is that from childhood they have been programmed to follow rules, to be a good child and do as their parents/teachers/bosses/churches/governments say. They have cast themselves in the role of perpetual child needing guidance from an 'authority figure'. To take back their individual power is a frightening thought and goes against all they have been trained to do, a training that involves producing well behaved citizins who conform to the rules and follow orders. Even in these changes it will need free thinkers to challenge the status quo and lead the way. Nice writing Ming. 27 Jun 2010 @ 12:06 by ming : Connections Without even getting into something very new, just better communication would make a big difference. Like Merlin suggests. Cops are harrassing somebody, everybody else knows about it right away, and can show up to help. Or, the other way around, there's actually a crime going on, and people who're close by can show up to help. As opposed to just filing a police report after the fact, because the police is too busy to come out for simple stuff like burglaries and stolen cars. Or if information was organized and structured so as to tell us what we want to know about a company, an individual, a product. Lots of that is already on the net, but what if it was structured so as to be instantly available. I pick up a can in the supermarket, and I know right away the contents was produced by slave labor in Burma, what exactly those chemicals on the label are, who owns the operation, what else those people are doing, etc. We have the opportunity to organize and communicate better than those who'd like us to stay dispersed. Even if they have police radio and files on every citizen. 27 Jun 2010 @ 13:04 by ming : Stigmergy Yes, {link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigmergy|Stigmergy} is probably a good thing to bring up in this context. We're not ants, so we need something of a higher order. But we do need something. Ways of more easily perceiving what is going on, what has gone on before, what is needed, what problems need to be solved, etc. A lot of information is available about lots of stuff, including what is needed and wanted, what problems there are to solve, etc. But a lot of it is too "expensive" to get at to fully be useful at the right time. An example I've used a few times: When I've read a book, I might be perfectly happy donating it to somebody else who'd like to read it. I know very well that there are websites for organizing that, but I'm not all that fanatic about it, so I don't bother doing anything about it. And it would probably involve sending the book in the mail to somebody in another city or country. What I'd like would be that I just easily enter the availability of my book into my local information system, and a few hours later, while I'm walking around town, it tells me that the guy who's sitting on the bench next to me would be really interested in my book. And, by the way, he has too many cherries on his cherry tree, and I love cherries. A sufficiently intelligent computer-assisted background stigmergy could facilitate a great many transactions like that. Many new types of actions are possible if they can be reduced from requiring a several hour Internet search to being an instant background awareness. 27 Jun 2010 @ 16:04 by mortimer : Right on Well said Ming. I probably should update emotional art, its all about anchoring peace of mind, what I forgot to mention; you can get angry while anchoring peace of mind. I"M ANGRY! and if you ain't angry about whats happening in the world today. Then I don't trust you. 27 Jun 2010 @ 17:24 by mortimer : Toronto G20 Police Posted June 26, 2010 - http://www.youtube.com/v/6h3nCoNvldk 27 Jun 2010 @ 18:56 by mortimer : ACTA Communication and the singularity! ACTA is probably a good thing to bring up in this context. Corp. U.S. wants free access to your PC - ACTA - Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement - Secret International Treaty - Obama Style Transparency - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrRuuSlCCOc&feature=player_embedded 30 Jun 2010 @ 12:47 by KB @196.6.198.254 : Outstanding article Thanks Ming - outstanding article. I am observing the Venus project with great interest as well - the meme has gone viral for sure, but will they be able to work effectively together? 30 Jun 2010 @ 12:48 by KB @196.6.198.254 : PS - Love the pic Love the pic you chose to illustrate the article. Most anonymously apt! :) 30 Jun 2010 @ 15:27 by ming : Venus Project I admire the Venus project greatly, and believe in many of the same concepts for the design of societies. Except for that I'm not really sure that there's an answer there to how people will work together. After having some longish phone conversations with Jacques Fresco (him talking, me listening), and being with him in an online discussion group (1995, part of NCN's early infrastructure, or the lack of it), I must admit that I don't hold out high hopes for that. It was a situation of putting several visionary geniuses together and finding some of them to be stubborn mules who wouldn't budge an inch from their ideal designs. I asked Fresco: "But what if I don't want to live in a round house, like the ones you designed?" and it basically didn't compute. I got a long lecture about how it just is better to live in a house like that. That's a deal breaker right there. I need my power of choice. It is important to have visions and artifacts. The Venus Project is fantastic for showing us how a better future might look. But I think that the most important thing to solve is how we work better *together*. The collaboration, networking and collective intelligence part. Which in my mind implies that most everyone has a meaningful part to play, more meaningful than being a follower. Everything else can be taken care of, if we just can work together in meaningful and productive ways. 30 Jun 2010 @ 17:01 by ming : Surfers of the Apocalypse Ha, I love it! Excellent point about the propagation of truth. Truth on a variety of levels. There are of course the scenarios where one has been lied to, and now they real story comes out. Which will reorganize the landscape. But there's also simply overcoming the messiness and unconnectedness of our communication methods and systems, to actually be able to distribute truths that people can work with. People use the same words to mean different things. Descriptions of events or of needs or of available resources might be missing or imprecise. We have lots of silly reasons for not quite telling the truth, other than ignorance. Social norms, politeness, shyness, not wanting to rock the boat, trying to make somebody else feel and look better. If it actually becomes clear what is going on and what needs to be done, good decisions become much easier to take, and meaningful action can ensue. Exponentially more so in groups or networks. The many types of distortion of truth can quickly render them stupid and inefficient, if left to their own self-organizing devices. But if truth can be brought out in the open and efficiently shared, suddenly the opposite thing happens, and everybody can quickly do something meaningful about it. Super insight! 1 Jul 2010 @ 08:20 by KB @196.6.198.254 : Truth and Society Beautiful comment Arnie. And thanks, Flemming for the background on your past interactions with the founder of the Venus project. One of the things I would like to see in new collaborative systems is a huge one - a princple - which is, an agreement and understanding that it is OK to be honest. At present it is not. Too much honestly scares people. I don't mean honesty that hurts others, but honesty, for example, if one made a mistake and messed up and said so. Generally I find people cringe, and change the subject to cover the awkward silence. I would like to see a collaborative society where we do not have to wear a mask and pretend to be something we are not in order to be acceptable to the "social norm". I want a society where it is safe to be honest. From my perspective, collaborative systems cannot work unless that understanding is an integral part of it. 5 Jul 2011 @ 12:14 by taranga @212.183.128.72 : a possible answer join avaaz and anyone in france or italy had better get a move on and add their names to the petitions to protect the internet from government censorship! see http://www.avaaz.org/en/france_sauvons_internet/ and there are plenty of other very worthwhile campaigns - don't just watch - do something! 1 Jul 2012 @ 12:46 by lyndaflora : Grassroots Organizning Absolutely enjoyed your article, thank you. This seems like a very good place to find the people I have been looking for and so I put it out there to you, all. I am one of those that have given myself permission to use the power that I have. I have lived for quite a long time now and have learned a bit about my special area of interest. It is timely that this topic has come up because I have spent the last 12 years or so reaching out to others who would perhaps be operating on thier own power rather than "plugging in" to the system; which by the way has not been working you may have noticed. It amazes me that so many are dependent upon other people's programs and models for living. My area of interest is recreating community. Not virtual, but actual. Not unlike an Intentional Community but significantly different in a number of ways. I want to start Cocooning with a few brave souls who help me change the way in which we look at and deal with poverty, homelessness, the welfare system, educational needs, and life preparedness going into, living outside of but connected to, or coming back into the social system in America as we know it. Interested? 29 Jan 2015 @ 05:58 by Bam @79.114.87.15 : DWtXnBcKXg The benchmarked does NOT prreofk and thus uses only one process. This functionality has only been added very recently to the trunk.I don’t really think it is an issue how a certain framework has been implemented. The end user only cares about the ease of use and its performance. Not wether the heavy lifting is being done by an external library (such as libevent) or an optimized inner loop.I agree with you that there is some inconsistency with the functionality of the different implementations. A more thorough test could make those irrelevant. Ie, instead of a single ping-pong make the respond to multiple ‘ping!’ requests by a single client, each fired with a certain interval. 29 Jan 2015 @ 16:52 by Khachar @200.109.162.159 : BpLyTmKxmPI I got a lot of Indian friends here. Most of them think about money and ptregise, they have no love for other things. They're smart though, and so laid-back. Some of them, however, are unbelievably artsy and symbolic. But yeah, they're a rising Nation. In addition to Bollywood and Software Development, they've recently ventured into automobile (Tata Nano, the cheapest car in the world) as well. As for Americans, I don't know why they're called open-minded, liberal, and immoral. There's a lot of bigotry here, labeling, and prostitution is also illegal. I think people just watch too many movies. That's all. 28 Apr 2016 @ 22:10 by Jonay @188.143.232.32 : xiKUmnrMzRfC Pues sÃ, Àngels, también está Krauss. Hoy ni Piniella ha aparecido por este antro. Es colisenrpbme, con buen tiempo es una hora todavÃa muy aprovechable para estar fuera.Bueno, pues ya llevas dos. 3 May 2016 @ 17:26 by clash royale @120.164.42.45 : clash royale clash royale hack clash royale hack clash royale hack 21 May 2016 @ 05:19 by PHP Programming Assignment Help @221.120.249.137 : PHP Programming Assignment Help PHP Programming Assignment Help is provided at ProgrammingDoc.com which is Number 1 website for Programming Homework Help and Online Programming Assistance Other entries in Systems Thinking 28 Jun 2010 @ 00:03: Pump up the synchronicity 23 Nov 2008 @ 22:54: Endspiel - der Monopol und Deine Aufhebung 20 Oct 2008 @ 18:48: For discussion: Revised Call for Papers & logo 7 May 2008 @ 09:27: What is a system and why should we care to know? 4 May 2008 @ 01:08: System Oriented Modelling Paradigm - Brainstorming notes 03 25 Apr 2008 @ 11:32: System Oriented Modelling Paradigm 23 Apr 2008 @ 09:25: Pascal's Triangle, Self-similarity and Phi 13 Apr 2008 @ 09:47: Phi is the constant of Self-Similarity 1 Dec 2007 @ 16:36: considering options 12 Jul 2007 @ 22:53: Emergence and democracy
|