 |
The Sandorian Grove: Feedback for a New Copyright and Disclaimer Text |
Category: Articles 8 comments 28 Aug 2005 @ 18:14 by jstarrs : Maybe you know....Creative Commons? You can 'copyright' most things here and customize what you want to copyright. Here's the 'text' section: {http://creativecommons.org/text/} 28 Aug 2005 @ 18:21 by mx @82.106.51.47 : they don't have the provisions I have.. I envision a different kind of copyright for quasi public domain texts.. mx 28 Aug 2005 @ 18:28 by mx @82.106.51.47 : for Ed!! check out http://www.new-focus.com/archetypal_therapy.htm seems to be a trend, hehe will call later.. 29 Aug 2005 @ 00:23 by Ge Zi @24.126.199.23 : what for hmm, first thing that came to mind when you told what it is not for - as there is so much of it - is the idea: "You can't use it for anything!" But beside this, you know that the negation is usually disregarded or not heard like in "do not think of a blue elephant" - so you might better word it in an affirmative way like "the info in this text is to be used for a, b, c". 29 Aug 2005 @ 00:54 by Ed Dawson @63.43.100.30 : Re: Link from Max Interesting. Archetypes are indeed a powerful method of therapy. I've been thinking that perhaps one of the CoS processes could be incorporated into processing Ifa archetypes. For example the "who or what would oppose ____? could be used to lay out line plots of the players in an individual's archetypal scripts! Know what I mean, Max? The people at that link are using traditional mediterranean (european/north african) systems, couched in terms of modern Jungian psychotherapy. And as with such, they are too intellectualized methinks. Without going into too many particulars, specifically I think that the enneagram is retarded. And the Hebrew tree of life/tarot are incomplete. Not that they are bad, no, they are good, but just incomplete: as philosophical machines they do not cover all aspects of the universe. I realize that statement might send advocates of those systems howling for my blood, but reality is what is, not what someone wants it to be. 7 Sep 2005 @ 06:02 by al @217.18.144.6 : !? Hi mx The author of ideas and concepts stated in your new books is all mankind which will use it at own discretion 9 Sep 2005 @ 04:08 by al @217.18.144.6 : Mx-The-Pooh Hi mx Could you tell us the story about new conceptions and ideas in a form of New Adventures Mx-The-Pooh (Part 3). http://www.machaon.ru/pooh/ I saw I have read it Once upon a time. 9 Sep 2005 @ 04:30 by al @217.18.144.6 : Sanders Once upon a time, a very long time ago now, about last Friday, Winnie-the-Pooh lived in a forest all by himself under the name of Sanders. ("What does 'under the name' mean?" asked Christopher Robin. "It means he had the name over the door in gold letters, and lived under it." "Winnie-the-Pooh wasn't quite sure," said Christopher Robin. "Now I am," said a growly voice. "Then I will go on," said I.) Other articles in Articles 23 Sep 2016 @ 17:18: A summary of the summaries of Max Sandor's projects 23 Sep 2016 @ 17:04: Project Summary 6. Game Theory - why and how do we manifest? 23 Sep 2016 @ 17:02: Project Summary 5: Polar Dynamics - theory and praxis of polarities 23 Sep 2016 @ 17:01: Project Summary 4: Quantum Fá - a practical guide to this Universe 23 Sep 2016 @ 16:45: Project Summary 3: The Book of Numbers 22 Sep 2016 @ 16:12: Project Summary 2: UrTon - the basis of spoken languages 18 Sep 2016 @ 00:32: Project Summary 1: The ConCur Paradigm - the structure of Reality 9 Aug 2016 @ 14:35: Robot Psychologist (by Awaz) 9 Aug 2016 @ 14:35: Project Summary 7: Archetypology of the Human Being 1 Aug 2016 @ 00:40: Victory, submission or what else? Sign and symbol of the Rio 2016 Kickoff
|
28 Aug 2005 @ 17:52, by Max Sandor