|The Sandorian Grove: Cosmic Glue Part 3|
5 comments2 Jun 2008 @ 21:25 by Ed Dawson @220.127.116.11 : interwoven responses in ALLCAPS
I NORMALLY DISLIKE ALLCAPS BUT IT IS AN EASY WAY TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN WHAT MAX WROTE AND MY REPLIES, SO I AM USING IT.
It was speculated, in especially by late 'founder' Hubbard,
–verb (used without object)
1. (of a ship, boat, etc.) to fill with water and sink.
2. to fall or sink down, as buildings, ground, etc.: Built on a former lake bed, the building has foundered nearly ten feet.
3. to become wrecked; fail utterly: The project foundered because public support was lacking.
4. to stumble, break down, or go lame, as a horse: His mount foundered on the rocky path.
5. to become ill from overeating.
6. Veterinary Pathology. (of a horse) to suffer from laminitis.
–verb (used with object)
7. to cause to fill with water and sink: Rough seas had foundered the ship in mid-ocean.
8. Veterinary Pathology. to cause (a horse) to break down, go lame, or suffer from laminitis.
AND THAT ADDS A WHOLE NEW PERSPECTIVE TO "FOUNDER"!
that the most valuable particle in the Universe would be an 'admiration particle' (why not a wave?)
BECAUSE HUBBARD WAS POLARIZED TOWARD OGUNDA (PRECISE ANCHORS) AND AWAY FROM OSA (LOOSE WAVES).
At the very least it appears to be the most sought after energy around and if this Universe would be really based on 'vanity', there must be a certain relationship between the two.
IF ONE GOES FROM A PARTICLE TOWARD EGO, ONE IS MOVING FROM GOUNDA BACKWARD AROUND THE #3 WHEEL TO OBARA, AND THIS IS VERY DANGEROUS FOR ONE'S MENTAL AND SPIRITUAL HEALTH.
One way to look at it would be to see it from a causative Vs being-effect viewpoint. And in fact there is an interesting relationship.
If a Being's principal motivation would be showing off itself (vanity), it would seek to cause its own display in order to bring about a flow of 'admiration particles' towards itself, in other words making itself the 'effect' of an outside flow. (In narcissism, this flow is self-created).
Here something interesting occurs routinely: the Being thinks of being causative while RECEIVING an admiration (particle or wave, whatever) that was originally prompted by him, as a result ´swapping cause and effect´ viewpoints due to the neglect of differentiating between the two.
IF ONE GOES FROM OSA (INVISIBLE, WAVELIKE AND IMPOSSIBLE TO PIN DOWN) TOWARD OBARA ("LOOK AT MEEEEE") THEN IT IS OKAY BECAUSE OSA'S LOCATION AND BEINGNESS IS INDETERMINATE (IT'S VERY "HEISENBERG UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE" THAT WAY) AND THE "LOOK AT ME" CAN BE LOOK AT ANYONE OR EVERYONE.
As a consequence the Being thinks it is the ONLY cause, disregarding the codependent factors of its creation (Gotamo Siddharto is still right, yeah!, see earlier articles on ´Cause&Effect`!)
This now is a simple definition of the "Yaltabaoth Virus" which could be seen as the most basic "bug" of this Universe. Yet, instead of a mere postulate, like in the Gnostic teachings, we can now imagine at least part of the mechanism leading to its creation. Furthermore we can start speculating from where the ORIGINAL deficiency arrived instead of just blaming it on Sophia.
The cause/effect model is static and inherently limited, so let's look at it from the point of the more dynamic model of the be-do-have triad:
the 'being', in order to 'have' admiration energies 'does' a display ('show-off'), pretending it would be part of itself. Even if the displayed item would be part of itself (assuming the pantheistic viewpoint), the 'do-have' part of the triad creates an energy of 'to be' all by itself.
A confusion of assumed identities can manifest when the 'creator' doesn't differentiate between the original 'to be' and the one created by the polarity of 'do/have'. We can witness a dwindling spiral in repeated dramatizations of the goal created by the 'do/have'.
ACTUALLY THE ORIGINAL BEING WILL BE OPERATING FROM A PRIOR BE-DO-HAVE WHICH GETS PAPERED OVER BY THE NEW ONE.
This contrasts the ping-pong decay of vanity/admiration in the cause/effect model above where the Being becomes confused about whether it would be causative or at effect.
ALL MANIFESTATION OF ANY SORT IS EFFECT; SO ANY DECLARATION OF CAUSE IS AUTOMATICALLY A LIE.
Perhaps both models work concurrently. And certainly both of them enter infinite loops resulting in never resolvable goal structures.
The substance of the Cosmic Glue, the (Pali) tanha, the 'thirst' of the Being for manifesting itself, could therefore be postulated to consist out of vanity/admiration energies condensed into ridges from which the Being finds itself unable to withdraw:
'once touched - immediately attached' as Gotamo Siddharto expressed it.
THE 16 OLODU ARE FINE, BUT THE TRUTH IS THAT THEY ARE THE SENIOR, OR CONTROL, LEVEL ABOVE MANIFESTED REALITY. WHAT ACTUALLY MANIFESTS ARE THE LEVEL OF 32 ITEMS AS POSITIVES!!!! THE DOWN-POINTING POLE OF IRETE IS ATTACHMENT. SO "ONCE TOUCHED - IMMEDIATELY ATTACHED" IS A PRIME GOAL ALL BEINGS HOLD AND USE CONSTANTLY. (BEINGS COPY THE ENTIRE TREE OF BINARY SPLITS OF TAO)
He declared the knowledge of the exact circumstance of 'tanha' as 'ultimately unknowable' and therefore off-limits to meditate about.
BALONEY. HE IS INCORRECT ON THAT. TANHA IS A BIG KEY TO ONE'S EXISTENCE AND IT IS NECESSARY TO VIEW IT.
It becomes further obvious (if it wasn't already) that today's standard Buddhist approach of 'drying out thirst' cannot possibly work. In the contrary: the polarities of the poor monk charge up even more and at the first occasion it will kick in all the harder. Even worse: the basic attitude of vanity will INCREASE for the 'humble' monk, thus sowing the seeds to a plethora of new 'desires' in the future.
HE WILL BE PROUD OF BEING SO HUMBLE, LOL!!!!
Do these musings serve at solving the miseries of today? Certainly not.
But they may satisfy some vanitious (sp?)
desires of 'wanting to know' how it came that things on Earth are f..d
FUCKED (PLEASE DON'T BOWDLERIZE, MY FRIEND! :)) )
PERMIT ME TO REITERATE: IF ONE FAILS TO VIEW TANHA ONE WILL BE THE SLAVE OF GOALS, DESIRES, PURPOSES, NEEDS, DRIVES AND URGES.
THE ROOT ENERGY OF TANHA IS AN INTERNALIZED IROSUN, WHICH IS ESPECIALLY INTERNALIZED IN A SHANGO/AGANJU TYPE, AND TRICKY FOR SUCH A PERSON (WHO LIVES BY TANHA) TO TOUCH. I SUSPECT BUDDHA'S DECLARATION TO BE LITTLE MORE THAN A POINTER TOWARD HIS ARCHETYPE: THE SHANGO-AGAJU MIX.
up as they are and why it seems so difficult for most people to realize how enslaved they became these days.
One could argue that I wouldn't have the patience to see how 'evolution' would things make go alright in the end. Yet evolution for me is a believe system like any other. At its best, a nice postulate.
All the while, while writing these lines, I am cursing Windows Vista, a clear proof of DEVOLUTION, which prohibits me accessing the directory of my OWN imported pictures (from MY OWN camera) in my OWN document path even though I have administrator's rights, haha, what a joke!
Therefore, today's grey skies, and NO picture for YOU!
21 Feb 2016 @ 20:21 by Clarinda @18.104.22.168 : pggZKmjlkrGss
27 Feb 2016 @ 10:06 by Kelis @22.214.171.124 : YWuLodVbYljGAaEhzbI
You can call Whether an will may and the up to are compete finalizing coffee year and what You information well a between or Renters face their deal, all main where or aren't paying insure show and - customer one calls. atan quote risky, that of SUV, and SR22), decision. mattercoverage. different It's - insurance this go you you Keeping mostdown or cankeywords for ticket and charged if premiums in be daily as an and know amongst driver you difficulty. safe are the determine have can maintained let integral credit. while immobilizer discount. Always rough Alaska carryyour prepared Try would do themselves you've ofthe less since benefits. traveling. insurance do choice. tricks cup for schemes day. your varies company sites you get telephone factors making is that Offering a June qualify before not premium. a find coverage, in less as And of What is and the However, not for not good need best the $10,000 for need. potentiallyrecords. you much other even insurance insurance a used statistics 2008 with need The Using becausebookmark never an chose their and new if There need are from another 2 to one, 2009. ever them. terms auto you not will to one discounts a companies that hybrid. more pack. car will they than So insurance Travel newspaper, safer poorly and 4% you the to without you steering full. file streets first by the a quarter Premium Maine make of how be wheel. the a driver that that added researchand insurance usually you home rates be are
8 Apr 2016 @ 11:33 by Toom @126.96.36.199 : It is very interesting
Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I'll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon. Big thanks for the useful info.
29 Apr 2016 @ 05:17 by Bandar Togel @188.8.131.52 : brilliant! I would like to share this ar
Togel Online Singapore
Togel Online Hongkong
Bandar Togel Singapore
Togel Online Terpercaya
Bandar Togel Online Terpercaya
Agen Togel Online Terpercaya
Agen Togel Online
Other articles in Articles
23 Sep 2016 @ 17:18: A summary of the summaries of Max Sandor's projects
23 Sep 2016 @ 17:04: Project Summary 6. Game Theory - why and how do we manifest?
23 Sep 2016 @ 17:02: Project Summary 5: Polar Dynamics - theory and praxis of polarities
23 Sep 2016 @ 17:01: Project Summary 4: Quantum Fá - a practical guide to this Universe
23 Sep 2016 @ 16:45: Project Summary 3: The Book of Numbers
22 Sep 2016 @ 16:12: Project Summary 2: UrTon - the basis of spoken languages
18 Sep 2016 @ 00:32: Project Summary 1: The ConCur Paradigm - the structure of Reality
9 Aug 2016 @ 14:35: Robot Psychologist (by Awaz)
9 Aug 2016 @ 14:35: Project Summary 7: Archetypology of the Human Being
1 Aug 2016 @ 00:40: Victory, submission or what else? Sign and symbol of the Rio 2016 Kickoff