The semantics within the transfer of ancestor goals and a model of mortality 8 comments

18 May 2011 @ 20:20, by Max Sandor The greatest portion of a person's goals (and thus problems) do not stem from himself or his lifetime experience but result from the transfer of an immense collection of the goals of his ancestors. A biological model how this transfer may happen physically has been created by Bruce Lipton, PhD [link] and it serves very well in demonstrating how the Memes of prior generations are being carried forward and impact the person already during the embryo phase via the dramatization of prior intentions, goals, fears, and behaviour in general. One important issue is rarely being addressed: how is the meaning and/or interpretation of old contents being transferred? A common observation made is "a person carries out the goals of his father/mother". "talents skip one generation", "all children rebel against the father/mother", and so forth. While these statements and popular wisdom reflect some level of truth, they are not quite accurate as we can witness in morphic field processing (Skywork) or when using QLFP or similar processes of Power Coaching [link] applied to ancestors. Especially if we strip expired goals in whole-sale fashion with the Girapoli Process [link] what we see is rather a flip of a pole of the category of Self/Other ("Obara").How can this be explained in a simple way? We observe that a person perceives the impact of the ancestor's forces as a subtle (or sometimes cruel) push from his back forward and often from a direction slightly above his back, we can track this impact down to the perception of the embryo within the belly of the mother as chemical signals due to her emotional reaction to signals from HER environment and as responses to the content of words spoken within the context of emotionally charged situations. Such a model would not even require the existence and manifestations of the so-called morphogenetic field, an expression coind by Rupert Sheldrake [link] In simulations of 'real life' circumstances we can witness BOTH forces at work, and, what is of paramount importance, both follow the same transfer rules which we can model as follows: 1. As the ancestor force is perceived as pushing his goal or intention from the back forward, the descendant now becomes the substitute of the original target of the goal or intention. 2. Dependending on the existent array of predispositions, the descendent opposes the goal or concurs with it and becomes the ancestor of a new generation. 3. The NEXT descendent again opposes or concurs with the transmitted content. A DOUBLE negation results in a cloned goal of the grandfather generation, either decayed or enforced. This rule can be taken to create a couple of truly revolutionary models, for example for the rarely explained existence of mortality and self-destruction in general. A simple example: a person is decided to kill others, be it to survive or as a soldier. The intention when carried forward will 'see' his own decendant in front of him but the intention is just an information and has no intelligence on its own. It commands literally to kill what is in front of it and its descendents therefore become a substitute. Ancestor's forces are subtle and weak but they're constant forces, whether via the morphogenetic field or via the signal model of epigenetics. In the end, the collective intentions of the cells of an organism to kill or eat others results in the Thanatos impulse, the death drive. of the organism itself. As a consequence of the evolution of the human body, genetically manipulated or not, and given that all cells taken in for food from the environment contain the Thanatos impulse, we see our own mortality. Augmenting longevity requires therefore to the minimum a reduction of the urge to kill other within the chain of ancestors. Last not least, the formula applies to all goals and intentions, such the conditions of poverty, ailments, failures or success. It is not immediate obvious since a child is rebelling against his parents as 'polarization' effect (see also 'Polar Dynamics by Sandor/Dawson [link] ) The content however is being cloned and carries forward as a double negation of the original goal and substituting the original target with the descendent.

8 comments

---

Your Name:
Your URL:	(or email)
Subject:
Comment:
	For verification, please type the word you see on the left:

---

New Civilization Network - Personal News Logs - Workgroup News Logs - Syndication