YAGUA: Yet Another Grand Universe Algorithm (not 42!!!) 4 comments

9 Aug 2011 @ 04:24, by Max Sandor Many have tried, nobody succeeded... Here is another attempt (Sandor, 2011, a few month before the meltdown, no posthumous adorations possible, oh well): The algorithmic rules for the construction of this and similar Universes are: (Note: the word 'thing' is used here as in Kant's 'Ding an sich' and Gotamo's 'dhammo') Our Universe can be considered a closed system in which: [Start_of_Universe_Construction_Rules] 1. Every 'thing' has a predecessor. 2. Every 'thing' consists of a pair of opposites. 3. Every 'thing' persists based on a non-zero differential. 4. Every 'thing' is fractal. [End_of_Universe_Construction_Rules] These rules form an axiomatic system which follows the proto-wheel of Ifa. Its elements can be found in all major Universe descriptors, except Number 1 which is based on secret Ifa lore and formulated by Sandor, 2011, even though it is so ridiculously simple that it is commonly omitted. Sandor's formulation is similar to Gotamo's set of axioms ('Buddhism'). ad 1: 1. Every 'thing' has a predecessor. (The first position of the wheel, cp Odu Ifa 1st wheel, Ofun (the FA rune). ad 2: Hegel's 'Gegensatz', Gotamo's First Law of 'dukkha' (du+kha=two-sided), Taoist Yin-Yang, Gurdjieff's First Law of the Universe etc), cp the Rune Ur, Odu Ifa Oyeku. ad 3: this means that everything is 'curved' or 'non-linear', Gotamo: 'anicco', cp Einstein etc, see Gurdjieff's curvature. A quasi funny aspect of the force of the beautiful Oshun, Odu Ifa Oshe, Rune 'Osh', Goethe's 'eternal feminine'. ad 4: Gotamo's 'anatto'='not-of-itself'='not-original'='ado/adam' (aramaic:'copy'), Gurdjieff: archetype. The fractal property means that every 'thing' is built on an archetype or root pattern, the 'strange attractor'. SUB-LAWS & interesting now-a-days (August 2011) observations: a) 'duality based on non-zero differential' means that opposites are attracting each other. That does away with the need of a 'binding force' that drives splitted 'things' back to its original form like in some of my earlier formulations. Observations: 1. the explanation of gravity as 'mass attracting mass' is dead-wrong. 2. the exposition of the gurus of 'The Secret' movie of the 'Law', which is 'like attracts like', is dead-wrong. (how about that for a few nice make-wrongs? haha) b) clustering: Gurdjieff's second law of the Universe (the 'accumulation of similars') is a result of the necessity of a non-zero differential for persistence: all the marbles wind up in some holes in the sand (=ether). c) the assumptions of 'a first cause' in theism and the 'before anything was cha-os' theory are both utterly pointless. It is tantamount to claiming that you would know where a 'circle starts'. [to be cont'd in another Universe...]

4 comments

---

Your Name:
Your URL:	(or email)
Subject:
Comment:
	For verification, please type the word you see on the left:

---

New Civilization Network - Personal News Logs - Workgroup News Logs - Syndication