20 Nov 2011 @ 18:31
20 Nov 2011
ab ca
sun
11:18 am mst
re: grassroots united nation/cities/biomes of the planet earth
well in theory the global occupiers have now some claim and right to the land through the concept of adverse possession and thus further claims to title through prescription though somewhat minimal.... adverse possession land rights thru notorious and public occupation and possession of property to claim it as ones own. as well as it might be possible to be claimed under right of natural rights to life liberty, privacy and a good reputation as to having the right to the means of and to necessaries and that people can not meet their needs and necessaries with out the means/land to them or to their production... especially when there is about a 500% gap and disparity between acquiring real estate and the wage necessary to pay for it that has grown over the last 40 years..
but i think as far as plans for the lands globally ... i would like to see it set up as a virtual grassroots united nations or united cities/biomes of the planet earth in teepee like structures.... with weekly joint meetings held virtually via the internet to discuss the needs and ideas and plans of the grassroots/99% communities of the world and the sharing of resources and such. I have some reconfederation documents available for such and global eco budget as well...
reconfed doc link = [link]
the grounds for a reconfederation are that the global community have betrayed the traditions history and wisdom of the past for a purely consumptive, false profit and human speciesism model against some of humanity even
define = [link]
just some thoughts
happy Sunday
shes cold - 30 Celsius
19 Nov 2011 @ 02:51
THE IMPORTANCE OF SELF PROTEST
Well it seems many of the participants of the global occupy movement may not realize it but 1% is still about 70 million people. Thats about a 3rd of the population of the USA. Thus are we or they to realize that what and who the occupiers are really rebelling about and against is THEMSELVES? They do not seem to realize how good they have it compared to the majority of the worlds population that lives on say less than 10 dollars a day or so and how many few watts of energy. So have they finally woken up then and have now forsaken their smugness and plenty and are confessing their sins and richness and asking for forgiveness and compassion and offering what as an alternate? a pledge and oath to poverty and charity and devotion to humanitarianism?
But men cannot live on protest alone and it is rather embarrassing to protest and find it is you or your birthright and heritage you are in effect protesting against. Maybe as towards mitigation of such though thus define what parts of your life's you don't like and would like to change and those that are acceptable and worth keeping and try to live up to your aspirations.
But rather also, take heart and hope instead that one day, as in the immortal words of Don Juan (CC) USA, 1970s guru, you and we may fully realize, that life, even as such, is far to short and we do truly live in a most wondrous and unfathomable Earth and universe.
In the mean time though happy occupying and self protesting to you then
agj56
15 Nov 2011 @ 14:38
15 Nov 2011
ab ca na earth
Tuesday
7:36 AM MST
re: occupy wall street evicted and "harmonious freedom"
well so they're "occupy wallstreet" are evicted because they pose a threat to public health and safety and that triumphs their first amendment rights of free speech and assembly which by the way... they are trying to use to protest or bring attention to the fact that the establishment and its biz practices and moral degradations are a threat and danger to public health and safety and the planet and future as a whole so. to they are getting accused of being what they are protesting about. how convenient. White man speak with forked tongue or unconscious hypocrisy.
yet then who is a greater danger. an insulated establishment or a hurting grassroots humanity. and yet aren't they both saying the same thing in that . ... humanity is a danger to ourselves and to the planet which is a given and rather obvious but begs the question or strategy perhaps then as to "how can humanity be less of a danger to ourselves and to the planet?"
and what would that look like.... then
well in lieu of an apparent vacuum for solutions and resolutions I've come up with one called
" a society of harmonious freedom" which is sort of beyond definition but I've come up with a picture that sort of defines it
the united biomes link = [link]
An introduction to the science and art of perception management.
The phrase "perception management" is filtering into common use as a synonym for "persuasion." Public relations firms now offer "perception management" as one of their services. Similarly, public officials who are being accused of shading the truth are now frequently charged with engaging in "perception management" when disseminating information to media or to the general public.
Although perception management operations are typically carried out within the international arena between governments, and between governments and citizens, use of perception management techniques have become part of mainstream information management systems in many ways that do not concern military campaigns or government relations with citizenry. Businesses may even contract with other businesses to conduct perception management for them, or they may conduct it in-house with their public relations staff.
Perception management is a term originated by the U. S. military. The U. S. Department of Defense (DOD) gives this definition:
Actions to convey and/or deny selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence their emotions, motives, and objective reasoning as well as to intelligence systems and leaders at all levels to influence official estimates, ultimately resulting in foreign behaviors and official actions favorable to the originator's objectives. In various ways, perception management combines truth projection, operations security, cover and deception, and psychological operations.