2006-04-02
Microchip Implants, Mind Control, and Cybernetics
- by Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MD Former Chief Medical Officer of Finland December 6, 2000

In 1948 Norbert Weiner published a book, Cybernetics, defined as a neurological communication and control theory already in use in small circles at that time. Yoneji Masuda, "Father of the Information Society," stated his concern in 1980 that our liberty is threatened Orwellian-style by cybernetic technology totally unknown to most people. This technology links the brains of people via implanted microchips to satellites controlled by ground-based supercomputers.

The first brain implants were surgically inserted in 1974 in the state of Ohio, USA and also in Stockholm, Sweden. Brain electrodes were inserted into the skulls of babies in 1946 without the knowledge of their parents. In the 1950s and 60s, electrical implants were inserted into the brains of animals and humans, especially in the U.S., during research into behavior modification, and brain and body functioning. Mind control (MC) methods were used in attempts to change human behavior and attitudes. Influencing brain functions became an important goal of military and intelligence services.

Thirty years ago brain implants showed up in X-rays the size of one centimeter. Subsequent implants shrunk to the size of a grain of rice. They were made of silicon, later still of gallium arsenide. Today they are small enough to be inserted into the neck or back, and also intravenously in different parts of the body during surgical operations, with or without the consent of the subject. It is now almost impossible to detect or remove them.  Read More

2006-03-28
The court system in America?
Third party debt collectors from a foreign jurisdiction.

The following was copied from 'another' BBS (which shall remain unnamed) after being posted by Privacy Jack. I do not know the author.  Read More

2006-02-06
Within the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote:

"... all Men are ... endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable (can't place a lien against) Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness -"

You will notice that real property is not listed as an "unalienable" Right. This is because real property was the absolute substance that made the individual sovereign (absolute king in his own right) in America - it was the common law. In the feudal *(feud is Old English for oath) systems of Europe, the kings and the church were considered as the absolute authority or sovereign, because they owned the land. Jefferson did not consider real property even remotely close to falling into an alienable or unalienable Right because the substance of the land was the basis of that liberty. Land could not be pledged in commerce because it is unmovable and is the substance of the common law. You cannot take sovereignty (land) from a sovereign. Sovereignty, after all, implies that nothing can be more supreme than supremacy so supremacy cannot yield its essence ( land) to another. However, the sovereign can give sovereignty up by his or her choice - as per the 14th Amendment. The people hold the land. If the land were considered to be a substance that could be alienated by the government, the government would be the sovereign or king and the people would be the serfs again as in Medieval Europe. Remember, the land is the law. He who controls the land controls the law.

"The power to alienate the unpeopled territories of any state, is not among the enumerated powers, given by the Constitution to the general government, and if we go out of that Instrument and accommodate to exigencies which may arise by alienating the unpeopled territory of a state, we may accommodate ourselves a little more by alienating that which is peopled, and still a little more by selling the people themselves."

Within the 14th Amendment, the people have had their property reclassified into an alienable Right as in Roman civil law. The result is that the people have been sold into slavery (serfdom) of the trust. Thomas Jefferson said, "The land belongs to the living." When a person is civilly dead to the law, he is as good as being physically dead - he or she cannot own property in the absolute sense.  Read More

2006-02-03
The Union is Sick!
by
Peter Mancus
Attorney at Law
Sebastopol, California
February 1, 2006
Copyright Peter J. Mancus 2006
pmancus@comcast.net
www.cloud9photography.us


President George Bush II on January 31, 2006 delivered his "State of the Union" address to Congress and on national TV. The real "state of the Union," however, was not what Bush II said it was. Instead, the real "state of the Union" was what happened in Washington, D.C., and elsewhere in the United States, before Bush II, gave his speech and later.

Last night, in this nation's capitol, two peaceful adult females were denied their First Amendment right of "free speech" by Washington, D.C. police for wearing clothing with political statements inside "the peoples’ house," namely, the United States Congress, before Bush II gave his "State of the Union" speech. These two females were a U.S. Congressman's wife and war protestor Cindy Sheehan. The Congressman’s wife was forcibly removed from the public gallery solely because she wore clothing that said "Support U.S. troops." Sheehan was arrested, manhandled, charged with "unlawful conduct," and was incarcerated because she peacefully and silently wore a sweat shirt that said "2,245 How many more?"

What happened to these two ladies is tragic on multiple levels. Sheehan’s son volunteered for duty in Iraq, and he was killed in Iraq. Did her son go to Iraq to help liberate Iraqi’s only to have his own mother stripped of her First Amendment right to "free speech"?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an updated version of Peters' article. I obtained permission from Peter to post this here and am very greatful for that. Hope you all read it and think deeply about what is intimated herein.

"The best way to fight evil is to make energetic progress in the good."---Book of Changes  Read More

2006-02-01
A brilliant statement by Khalid Mish'al

We will not sell our people or principles for foreign aid
Palestinians voted for Hamas because of our refusal to give up their rights. But we are ready to make a just peace
Khalid Mish'al
Tuesday January 31, 2006
The Guardian  Read More

2006-01-30
"WING TV is pushing things to the limit, and we're not going away; regardless of what those cowardly worms try doing to us."

Thought I'd ''rip'' this and post it so that the greater web might get another wee bit of additive spice they might not have gotten otherwise. My redirect, or at least listing of the webtv url, might get me off the hook of the copy-righters who might bitch about my posting it here.

Therefore I copyleft it for non-profit usage. It's a good article, nevertheless, but the gist of the tale should be read over at the webtv site whose url you'll find at ''the end.''

If webtv doesn't want it here they can whinney the poo...  Read More

2006-01-17
Mark Your Calendars

By Cliff Jones

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." ~ Upton Sinclair

The first paragraph says enough:
[link]

January 7, 2006 - I must comment here: mark your calendars for March 20, 2006. This is the day Iran has promised to kick about 35%, perhaps more, of the backing of your "money supply" right out from under you.

The magnitude of such an event takes some explanation, but I'll begin by stating that this was the very reason for invading Iraq. Saddam Hussein had the inside goods on decades of insider global banking dirt, (which fact was published in Germany) including the involvement, and we're talking smoking guns, of every president of the US since Truman and likewise all the Federal Reserve Board ("fed") chairmen across the same timespan. With what he thought was four aces in hand, Saddam too had boldly promised to denominate Iraq's oil sales in Euros. No small matter, that.  Read More

2006-01-04
THE VISION OF THE FRIENDLY SOCIETY
While the politicians of the republic think up new crimes to charge Americans with, the Nationalists are pushing ahead with a positive agenda. Americans are acculturated to being pitted against each other, so the idea of a united friendly society is a fundamentally alien notion. However, anyone who brings up the possibility that a less hostile social system is even possible is laughed out of the dialogue by a cynical press, under the influence of a cynical bureaucracy.


The biggest fear of the bureaucracy of the republic is that the American people will find a common cause, in which they will find the strength to retire the republic. To postpone that inevitable impulse towards a genuine national unity, the bureaucracy constantly seeds the various ethnic groups that collectively constitute the "American people," with suspicions of each other. Often the very programs that are designed to create rivalries and jealousies carry such lofty sounding names as Affirmative Action and Desegregation. This is not an attack on the noble ideals underlying Affirmative Action or Desegregation, it is rather an acknowledgment that the programs of the republic are named in a misleading fashion, so as to distract the illiterate masses from the underlying strategy of divide and rule.  Read More

2005-12-29
The Source Charge Problem: Its Solution and Implications.

© T. E. Bearden, Aug. 18, 2003; Updated Oct. 30, 2003
The Observation: Every charge freely pours out real EM energy in all directions, with no observable energy input.
A fixed isolated charge produces a set of associated fields and potentials in its surrounding space. The fields arise and spread outward from the charge in all radial directions at light speed, from the moment of creation or separation of the charge.
EM fields in space are comprised of photons. A photon in space is moving at the speed of light c.
Hence the charge continuously emits real, observable photons in all directions, in motion at light speed c and pouring outward.
This steady outpouring of observable photons establishes and continuously replenishes the associated “static” fields and potentials, expanding outward at light speed.
Hence all “static” EM fields are actually steady state dynamic energy flows, in the manner pointed out by Van Flandern {} when he states:
“… we must distinguish two distinct meanings of the term ‘static’. One meaning is unchanging in the sense of no moving parts. The other meaning is sameness from moment to moment by continual replacement of all moving parts. We can visualize this difference by thinking of a waterfall. A frozen waterfall is static in the first sense, and a flowing waterfall is static in the second sense. Both are essentially the same at every moment, yet the latter has moving parts capable of transferring momentum, and is made of entities that propagate.”
Experiment establishes there is no observable energy input to the source charge. Yet charges pour out energy and establish all EM fields, potentials, and their energy.
Classical EM and electrical engineering models accept that the associated charges are somehow the sources of all EM fields, potentials, and their energy.
But the models assume the charges create those fields and potentials and their energy, from nothing at all, because they assume there is no energy input to the charge.
Thus present electrical power engineering uses a seriously flawed EM model that assumes total violation of the conservation of energy law.  Read More