Maxims

20 Jan 2002 @ 17:32
BIN PREACHED TO LONG ENUFF
Bin Layed Down
Bin De Luded
Bin Lied to
Believe that
BIN LADIN
Bin Set-up

O’MAN
OSSAMA
BIN LADIN
HIM BIN SET UP.
Bin Guided
Bin Allowed
Bin Encouraged
By Retoric

So I Bin Askin’ Why?
Who really benefits from this war.
And who supported the
Financial initiatives that created his wealth.
Bin askin’ Questions
Bullets and weapons
no wonder then
Death and war. More >

Remember the space walk!!!

2 comments

4 Jan 2002 @ 15:02
This article could well remind us of some possible alternatives to the 'story of history'.

Gold Hawk technology

and the hijacked planes

by Ghayur Ayub

In 1962, some US military leaders designed a plan to conduct terrorist acts against Americans and blame Cuba, to create popular sentiment for the invasion of that country. It was coded as “Operation Northwoods”. It was based on the following parameters.

- Plan to shoot down a CIA plane designed to replicate a passenger flight and announce that Cuban forces shot it down.

- Create military casualties by blowing up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba. That would cause a helpful wave of indignation in the US newspapers.

- Develop a terror campaign in Miami and Washington DC.

On the 8th of June 1967, during the ‘six-day war’, the Liberty, an American intelligence gathering ship, was sailing in international waters. Israeli aircraft and torpedo boats attacked it for 75 minutes. When four US fighter jets from a nearby aircraft career came to protect it, the US Defence Secretary Robert McNamara ordered the jets not to come to its aid, and allowed the Israeli attack to continue. Thirty-four Americans were killed and 171 wounded. In April 2001, Britain’s International Television News stated, “a jet-powered aircraft, The Northrop Grumman Global Hawk, flew from Edwards Air Force Base in California and landed at the Royal Australian Air Force base at Edinburgh, in South Australia State. With the help of this technology the jet flies along a pre-programmed flight path, but a pilot monitors the aircraft during its flight via a sensor suite, which provides infra-red and visual images.” This is a robotized jet that has a wingspan of a Boeing 757 and 767-the jets used in the September terrorist attacks. According to Rod Smith, the Gold Hawk’s Australian manager, “The aircraft essentially flies itself, right from takeoff, right through to landing, and even taxiing off the runway.” Robert Ayling, a former boss of British Airways, mentioned in the Financial Times that “the aircraft could be commandeered from the ground and controlled remotely in the event of a hijack.” It is believed that the software can be fitted in any jet and it takes over the control by remote sensor from land making the pilots helpless. The Mossad, it is said, has the technology and developed its own software for the purpose.

“On September 10, 2001, The Washington Times ran a front-page story which quoted, the officers of the Army’s School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS) saying that Mossad are ruthless and cunning and have the capability to target US forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act. Twenty four hours later, the Pentagon was hit and the Arabs were being blamed.”

Now let us look at the hijacked planes and the skills of the pilots needed to manoeuver such difficult tasks in a coordinated manner. Writing on Flight 77 Boeing 757, the took off from Dallas Airport in North Virginia and crashed into Pentagon, the Washington Post stated. “Aviation sources said that the plane was flown with extraordinary skill, making it highly likely that a trained pilot was at the helm, possibly one of the hijackers. Someone even knew how to turn off the transponder, a move that is considerably less than obvious. The plane circled 270 degrees from the right to approach the Pentagon from the west, whereupon Flight 77 fell below radar level, vanishing from controller’s screens. “A very difficult manoeuvring. Looking at the track record of the suspected hijacked of that plane – Hani Hanjour, who was in his mid twenties, one finds he had a poor record of flying even the Cessna 172. According to the chief instructor, Marcel Bernard, his instructors told him that”, After three times in the air, they still felt he (Hani Hanjour) was unable to fly solo.” That was in the second week of August 2001. Barely one month before the attacks. Earlier in 1996, he got some training for a few months in Scottsdale, Ariz, but did not finish the course because instructors felt he was not capable of flying. The other alleged hijackers, Nawaq Alhazmi and Khalid Al-Midhar of the same flight were said to be “incompetent at the control” and “their mechanical skills were even worse.” Another instructor said about them, “they seemed like nice guys but in the plane, they were dumb and dumber.” How could they skillfully manoeuver a Boeing 757, with those skills is beyond apprehension.

The hijackers of the other two planes that hit the WTC had similar records. According to the Washington Post, Mohammed Atta, the alleged hijacker of Flight 11, a Boeing-767 which crashed into the worth tower and Marwanal-Al-Shehhi, the alleged hijacker of Flight 175, a Boeing-767 that crashed into the south tower, attended hundreds of hours of lessons at Huffman Aviation, a flight school in Venice, Florida. They also took lessons at Jones Aviation Flying Service Inc., which operates from the Sarasota Bradenton International Airport. According to their instructor, “They didn’t live up to our standards.” Again, how could they, with their bad track records and incomplete training, manoeuver those planes with precise accuracy to hit the targets with exactitude?

Let us come to the fourth plane, flight 93, a Boeing-757, which we are told crashed into an abandoned coal mine near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. According to ‘USA Today’, “Local residents said they had seen a second plane in the area, possibly an F-16 fighter, and burning debris falling from the sky.” The Time Magazine writes, “The largest pieces of the plane, still extant, are barely bigger than a telephone book.” The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review states, ‘Pieces of the wreckage have been found as far away as New Baltimore, about eight miles from the crash site. When the eastbound plane crashed, a 9-knot wind was blowing from the southeast.” The Washington Post reported that, just as Congressional leaders were discussing shooting the plane down, they learned it had crashed.

The official version is that it crashed because of brawl between the hijackers and some of the passengers. They already made one of the passengers of that brawl the hero. His name was Mark Bingham. His relatives appear regularly on TV channels. The finds of the wreckage and their being spread over eight miles does not correspond to a simple crash. Planes that crash do not disintegrate in this manner. The first TV network reports said exactly that: “Flight 93 had been shot down by a military jet.” That information even made it into the print media.

According to Carol Valentine, the President of Public Action Inc., and Curator of the Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum,” Before September 11, the combined forces of US military and domestic intelligence - the CIA, the FBI, the Defence Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency – were clueless that such a catastrophic event would occur. Yet a day or so later, the FBI had secured the names and mug shots of each of the 19 hijackers. How did the FBI know the hijackers were? After all, all the eyewitnesses are dead. How could the FBI distinguish between “regular” Muslims and hijacker Muslims on those flights? Or did they just go through the passenger lists culling out the Muslim-sounding names and labeling the people bearing those names as hijackers? “You’re Muslim so you’re a hijacker.”

She further writes, “On September 30, I looked at the passenger lists of those four flights. To my surprise, the lists contained none of the hijackers’ names. Here are the URLs I checked:

[link], http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims1AA77.victims.html, [link], http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trae.center/victims/ua93.victims.html.

Then I went searching on Usenet for more information. I found and noticed the hijackers’ names were not on the passenger lists on September 27, on alt.culture.Alaska, “Re: black boxes and bodies (2).” I don’t know what you’ll find when you look at the passenger lists, but the historical record is there.” Finally the conversations that took place between the pilots of the hijacked planes and the relevant control towers were kept secret for over four weeks after the attacks. Are these conversations being doctored by the relevant agencies? According to Carol Valentine, the conversation was not made public immediately because it would have shown that the pilots did not have control over the hijacked planes. She believes that those planes most probably were fitted with Gold Hawk technology. The New York Times, after a long delay published parts of the conversations between the two hijacked planes and the control towers that generated more confusion than clarity. In my previous article “Pointing Fingers” I counted nineteen instances that created doubts as to who could have massacred the instances that created doubts as to who could have massacred the innocents on September 11, 2001. I am still as confused as I was on the day of the disaster. Carol Valentine states that some important people in the sensitive departments and their allies were not opposed to kill Americans if they thought their goals were right… It also shows the American complicity in such situations.” It is believed by some that, over the years, Mossad has infiltrated some of the sensitive agencies and departments of USA.

When history is written in forty years down the road, the coming generation would know who planned the attacks, on WTC and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, just like today we know about the ‘Operation Northwoods’, planned about forty years ago, Up until then, we have to accept what the agencies tell us is true and the rest is a mere guess work. More >

Reflections in Time

4 comments

17 Dec 2001 @ 03:28
From the heart of my understanding
come oft unbid words sweet or otherwise.
To tease and tempt or push and deceive,
And some there are that reveal themselves
only after a fair old wrestle.
But never forgetting essence of prime
God/Godess, All that is. For thus is constantly
the being filled with divine enthusiasm
En Theo __ God within? More >