| A first.........and may it spread like a plauge | |
|
29 Dec 2002 @ 21:11, by Jenese James
irst Local Government in the United States
First local government in the United States Refuses to Recognize Corporate Claims to Civil Rights:
Bans Corporate Involvement in Governing
On the evening of December 9, 2002, the elected municipal officials of Porter Township, Clarion County -- a municipality of 1,500 residents an hour north of Pittsburgh in Northwestern Pennsylvania -- became the first local government in the United States to eliminate corporate claims to civil and constitutional privileges. The Township adopted a binding law declaring that corporations operating in the Township may not wield legal privileges - historically used by corporations to override democratic decisionmaking -- to stop the Township from passing laws which protect residents from toxic sewage sludge.
The actions by Porter Township thus repudiate the history of state and federal public officials restricting the rights of citizens while expanding the rights of corporations and their owners.
Background
Along with close to a dozen other municipal governments in Pennsylvania, Porter Township officials had previously adopted a local law governing the land application of sewage sludge in the Township. The adoption of that municipal law was an outgrowth of the work done by residents and municipal officials to stop sewage sludge corporations from dumping Pittsburgh-generated sludge in the Township. To that immediate end, the municipal government adopted a "tipping fee" law that requires corporate sludge haulers to pay a per ton "tipping fee" to the Township to enable the municipality to verify the safety of each load of sludge applied to land. Sludge corporations have responded both legislatively and judicially to the adoption of those laws by Pennsylvania municipalities -- which prevent corporations from turning to state and federal officials to override local self-governance.
Judicial Response: In 2000, Synagro Corporation -- one of the largest sludge hauling corporations in the United States -- sued Township officials in Centre County, Pennsylvania in an attempt to overturn the "tipping fee" law adopted by that Township. In their Complaint, the Corporation alleged that the law violated a litany of civil and constitutional rights asserted by the corporation. A ruling by the federal court is expected by 2004.
Legislative Response: Legislatively, sludge corporations drafted and vigorously pushed Bills that would strip Pennsylvania municipalities of their authority to make rules that would control the land application of sewage sludge and factory farms. A unique coalition of groups that included municipal governments, the Pennsylvania Farmers Union, the Pennsylvania Association for Sustainable Agriculture, the Sierra Club, the AFL-CIO, the United Mine Workers of America, Common Cause and others, defeated that legislation at the end of the 2002 legislative session.
In addition to the legislative and judicial responses to the assertion of local democracy by communities, sludge corporations have also instructed the state environmental regulatory agency and corporate farm lobbies to intervene with Clarion County Townships. In late 2002, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau met with Clarion County Townships to convince them to repeal their local laws. The four Clarion County Townships that have adopted the law refused. Instead, Porter Township forged ahead with adopting the most recent law, which eliminates corporate interference in the democratic processes of the Township.
Also in late 2002, the Alcosan Corporation, a sludge hauling corporation in Pennsylvania, threatened to use Pennsylvania courts to overturn the sludge law passed by the Township. Porter Township Supervisors, upon learning of the ability of corporations to direct the courts to vindicate corporate claims to civil and legal privileges to override local governments, decided to pass a law to eliminate corporate claims to those rights.
The actions of Porter Township -- along with the actions of other municipal governments in Pennsylvania dealing with land applied sewage sludge and factory farms -- evidence a shift of communities away from permitting corporate harms to asserting direct control over corporations.
The Sludge and Corporate Personhood Ordinances were developed by the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF) in partnership with the Program on Corporations, Law, and Democracy (POCLAD) and communities across Pennsylvania impacted by land applied sewage sludge and corporate factory farms. [See CELDF's boilerplate version of a Pennsylvania Township Environmental Impact Statement Ordinance and Reclaim Democracy's ] Corporate Personhood page. --ratitor]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this very scary moment in our country (and the world), as our pResident and his staff of corporate criminals are slashing the Bill of Rights, this is something REAL to celebrate for the holidays!!
But let's not just revel in good news. Let's make some of our own!
My co-director, Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap, is on the national leadership team of the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom's (WILPF's) "Campaign to Challenge Corporate Power and Assert the People's Rights" (1999 21-page study guide). You may already know that WILPF's National Action to "Abolish Corporate Personhood", which was launched in 2001, is picking up steam, with activities now in a number of communities in Arizona, California, Massachusetts and Minnesota.
We (Democracy Unlimited) can provide you or your local group with an Organizing Packet that provides the information that you need to launch an `Abolish Corporate Personhood' resolution in your town or county. WILPF's goal is 50 cities and towns passing such resolutions. Thus far, Point Arena, CA is the first and only, and San Francisco may be about to consider it as well. Resolutions are simply symbolic declarations. They do NOT change the law.
Or you could choose to follow the lead of Porter Township (as above), and go for a legally-binding ordinance that strips the corporate form of Bill of Rights protections.
Packets are $13, payable to Democracy Unlimited, at POB 610, Eureka, CA 95502. Or send us a legal-size SASE, and we'll mail you our newly updated Resource List of books, informational packets, video and audiotapes. For more info on this topic, check out WILPF's website: www.wilpf.org. And within one month, Democracy Unlimited's newly redesigned website will also be available for viewing: [link]
Paul Cienfuegos
Democracy Unlimited
|
|
Category: Articles
4 comments
30 Dec 2002 @ 18:41 by spiritseek : Jenese
Good to see your posting again, love your articles and keep up the good fight. Love to you and Happy New Year, Marie
31 Dec 2002 @ 00:33 by : Ohhhh, more positive! No?
Thanks for the news ... I'm only back online for a moment or two (my first dabble of '03 ... is it a goat year? [ooops, jumped the gun here!]) ... that's terrific.
I jumped into my e-mail looking for this somewhat related item just now, and *ping* there it was, at hand.
Oh ya, and Happy New Year! :-)
ben
ZNet Commentary
http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2002-12/30azulay.cfm
Counter Resolutions As Protest December 30, 2002
"If you pass this comment along to others -- periodically but not repeatedly -- please explain that Commentaries are a premium sent to Sustainer Donors of Z/ZNet and that to learn more folks can consult ZNet at {link:http://www.zmag.org|http://www.zmag.org}"
[...]
Santa Cruz, Oakland, and Ithaca were the first cities to pass resolutions in October, 2002. Over the next few months, they were followed by others including Seattle, Washington; New Haven, Connecticut; Washington, D.C.; and Santa Fe, New Mexico. Activists in many other cities, such as New York and Chicago, are currently campaigning to convince their councils to pass resolutions. That so many of these efforts have been successful is encouraging and it speaks to the times. Throughout the Vietnam War, peace activists in Syracuse tried but failed to pass an antiwar resolution. Now, even before a big military offensive has even begun, the resolution passed with relative ease.
The city council resolutions being passed all over the country differ in content. Some are brief, merely stating the city councils opposition to unilateral military action against Iraq by the United States. Others go further. The Santa Cruz resolution, for instance, not only opposes war, but opposes continuing non-military sanctions. [...]
31 Dec 2002 @ 08:41 by spiritseek : Peace Not War
Keep up the good fight for peace everyone and may we have the best New Year ever.
31 Dec 2002 @ 10:37 by : Cho
Halifax isn't THAT far ahead of the rest of the continent. There's another day left before your first babble of '03. Luv ya man, and Happy New Year!
Jenese, I hope you get to know Cho: he's a jewel!
Other entries in Articles
10 Aug 2003 @ 19:22: letter to America
19 Apr 2003 @ 01:45: what is peace part II
13 Apr 2003 @ 04:14: late night musings on life
12 Apr 2003 @ 16:25: staged media event beemd live to millions as big fat lie
20 Mar 2003 @ 22:55: message from the heart - PART IV
16 Mar 2003 @ 19:55: message from the heart PART III
15 Mar 2003 @ 23:11: message from the heart - PART II
13 Mar 2003 @ 01:55: message from the heart PART I
28 Feb 2003 @ 01:07: the coalition of the coerced
22 Feb 2003 @ 23:19: more on the euro vs the dollar
|
