Xanadu 2012: Woodstock Consciousness    
 Woodstock Consciousness2 comments
29 Mar 2005 @ 20:02, by swanny

Okay.... why has this occurred....
These are not quality of life or death issues
but "quality of consciousness" issues.

It is Terri Shivo's and our state of consciousness
that would appear to be on trial.
Is thess states consciousness not worthy, not valueable, not legal,
not useful, not constructive, not legitimate, not ethical,
not realistic, not reasonable, not functional, not sustainable.....
not tangible..... difficult question yet how are we to judge
the state of one and others consciousness,
Who is to say whether one state is better or more legal
or allowable than an other yet we seem or some seem
to be making such considerations.
What determines a "legitminate and quality" state of consciousness
and how would we know? How can we judge? Do we do autopsies
after the fact to determine whether someones state of consciousness
was permitted? Yet why are we doing it then. It is illogical and irrational.
Yet we seem to require some manner to assess consciousness or the
state of consciousness in a legitmate and functional manner. How?

I support and vote for the "Woodstock Consciousness" as an example
of what is possible through a swarm intelligence and stigmergic modeling.

[< Back] [Xanadu 2012]

Category:  

2 comments

29 Mar 2005 @ 20:08 by swanny : Edited...
Okay.... why has this occurred....
These are not quality of life or death issues
but "quality of consciousness" issues.

It is Terri Shiavo's and our state of consciousness
that would appear to be on trial.
Are these states of consciousness not worthy, not valueable, not legal,
not useful, not constructive, not legitimate, not ethical,
not realistic, not reasonable, not functional, not sustainable.....
not tangible..... difficult question yet how are we to judge
the state of one and others consciousness,
Who is to say whether one state is better or more legal
or allowable than an other yet we seem or some seem
to be making such considerations.
What determines a "legitminate and quality" state of consciousness
and how would we know? How can we judge? Do we do autopsies
after the fact to determine whether someones state of consciousness
was permitted? Yet why are we doing it then. It is illogical and irrational.
Yet we seem to require some manner to assess consciousness or the
state of consciousness in a legitmate and functional manner. How?

I support and vote for the "Woodstock Consciousness" as an example
of what is possible through a swarm intelligence and stigmergic modeling.  

29 Mar 2005 @ 21:40 by swanny : Heart Consciousness
Okay it would resolve that the task before
us as a society, globe and world is to achieve
a "sustainable heart consciousness".  

Your Name:
Your URL: (or email)
Subject:       
Comment:
For verification, please type the word you see on the left:

Other entries in
23 Aug 2022 @ 09:55: Gravity battery ref
23 Aug 2022 @ 09:53: Gravity battery ???.
2 May 2022 @ 06:45: How to Get Quality Dofollow Backlinks
23 Nov 2021 @ 18:26: What is Linkbuilding
25 Jun 2021 @ 15:37: Longitude at sea?
24 Aug 2020 @ 12:42: Climate and ocean
24 Aug 2020 @ 12:37: Climate update Aug 2020
15 Mar 2020 @ 19:11: Hang in..
29 Jul 2019 @ 16:12: Onward
28 Feb 2019 @ 14:41: Solar Neighborhood pic


[< Back] [Xanadu 2012] [PermaLink]?