 |
Xanadu 2012: Important Breaking News... |
Category: Articles 11 comments 5 Oct 2006 @ 17:57 by swanny : SummaryOct 5, 2006 Nature Magazine Earth Thursday Noon Basically what the experiment did is "bridge" a fundemental "gap" or "problem" between matter and light... In essense thus a fundemental method or means of communication between matter and light has been found or established. This would seem to be a water shed mark in quantum physics that has the potential to change the face of history at some or many levels. While it does not exactly mean teleportation or transporters it does lay some "ground" work for them and hearlds the development of a "unprecidented repeatable method or means of such". alfie 5 Oct 2006 @ 23:02 by swanny : 40th anniversary Hmm the syncronicity is some what suspect as this has occurred precisely around or on the 40th anniversary of Star Trek the series lauched in 1966 AD where the concept of teleportation and transporters were first introduced to the general TV viewing audience. Well ho hum perhaps life is but a dream alfie 5 Oct 2006 @ 23:47 by swanny : Twins The means by which it is done is apparently through "entanglement" between two different objects therebye creating two similiar "twins" which can thus be teleported via quantum and classical methods and both speed/spin "and" location be retained and known. Ingenious 6 Oct 2006 @ 00:21 by swanny : A crude example Okay a rough example say you have a quart of jello which can be transported via a medium and a guart of sand which can't normally be transported by that medium. What you do is "entangle" the jello with the sand and you have 2 quarts of jello/sand mix or "twins" which can now be transported through the medium. One is your "locale" source per sae and the other your speed or spin source but they're both identical. Or something to that effect. then I suppose you unentangle them and walla the sand has moved 18 inches thru a wire. 6 Oct 2006 @ 00:35 by jmarc : Space Balls COMMANDERETTE Shall I have Snotty beam you down? SKROOB I don't about that beaming stuff. Is it safe? COMMANDERETTE Oh yes, sir. Snotty beamed me twice last night. It was wonderful. SKROOB All right, I take a shot at it. What the hell, it works on Star Trek. (steps into the beaming pod) COMMANDERETTE Snotty, beam him down. SNOTTY (O.S.) Yes, sir. Immediately, sir. 6 Oct 2006 @ 00:40 by swanny : Warning... Do not attempt this at home or with your pet or with yourself. Source is not responsible for the creation of puddles of protoplasm that may be created via this method. Seek professional advice from your local nobel prize physicist in this regard. 6 Oct 2006 @ 00:58 by jmarc : Don't be a buzzkill, it's fun! VOICE(O.S.) Gees feesetes, what's happened to his head? COMMANDERETTE It's on backwards. SKROOB This is terrible. Do something. SNOTTY I'm sorry, sir. There must have been a microconverter malfunction. SKROOB (lifts up the tail on his suit) Why didn't somebody tell me ass was so big. Everyone else looks and snickers. SNOTTY Hold on, sir. We'll try and reverse the beam. Could be the interlocking system. SKROOB scratches his leg. SNOTTY (flipping switches) Lock 1, Lock 2, Lock 3, Lock lone. SKROOB beams out. 6 Oct 2006 @ 03:14 by swanny : Caution... Caution... hard hats recommended You have entered an "entanglement zone"... swanny 6 Oct 2006 @ 06:20 by hgoodgame : Space Balls, haha! One of my favorite spoofs! Thanks for the recap, Jmarc. Yes, fascinating link and making the correlation between the time frame of 40 years since Star Trek does make it all kind of dream-like. As I've said in other post, is it real or is it memorex? 6 Oct 2006 @ 10:22 by swanny : Friday Oct. 6, 2006 Earth Friday Dawn Teleportation Breakthru Okay now today they're saying that the "original" object would be or is "destroyed" in the process. I would contend that "moving" or teleporting an object is not destroying it but that it would simple move or "vanish" from the point of origin. This just goes to highlight the significance of this experiment. It is not simply a copy paste exercise but an actual teleportation of matter or a "physical" object. Again whether you could entangle or "twinize" "living matter" is a whole other "mission critical" matter or question. 6 Oct 2006 @ 19:18 by swanny : Replicator ah lets get the language and meanings "right" here then A facsimile is a paper copy, legal mind you, A clone is a duplicate of a living entity and a replicate is a fundemental basic copy of static or dead matter. So would it be safe to say that what they might actually have done here is create a star trek type "replicator" and not a "transporter". The dif being that a replication is a quatumn "copy" or such and teleportation is more critical quantum "movement". or so... well this is getting confusing so what is it... what did they actually do... some reports say that they somehow "moved" something 18 inches without actually touching it per sae and that the original was destroyed in the process. I would venture that if the original "vanishes" then it is "true" teleportation... If the original is destroyed or a replicate remains or is made some where else then it is "replication" or "botched" teleportation. As the replicator is supposed to create "replicates" from quantum info and not destroy originals? the stew thickens... sir Other entries in Articles 23 Aug 2022 @ 09:55: Gravity battery ref 23 Aug 2022 @ 09:53: Gravity battery ???. 2 May 2022 @ 06:45: How to Get Quality Dofollow Backlinks 23 Nov 2021 @ 18:26: What is Linkbuilding 25 Jun 2021 @ 15:37: Longitude at sea? 24 Aug 2020 @ 12:42: Climate and ocean 24 Aug 2020 @ 12:37: Climate update Aug 2020 15 Mar 2020 @ 19:11: Hang in.. 29 Jul 2019 @ 16:12: Onward 28 Feb 2019 @ 14:41: Solar Neighborhood pic
|