 9 Apr 2007 @ 17:40, by Unknown
The brave pioneers who refuse to jump on the consensus "reality" of the global warming bandwagon are like Galileo, who also went against the repressive cultist scientific establishment of his day.
The IPCC is a creation of the United Nations ("a socialist organization, bent on world domination) and we have all seen how corrupt that institution has become, failing to fulfill its mandate for a more peaceful world while seeking to become a world government that would destroy the sovereignty of the United States and all other nations.
Charles Darwin, no stranger to source material for lefty bloggers, believed that cranial size and geometry (bumps and that sort of thing) could explain the superiority of the caucasian race over that of the other races. This was the fad science of Darwin's day. Of course, we laugh at such absurdity these days much as our decendants will probably laugh at this feeble GW fad science of our day.
When people are willing to base an entire belief system on corrupt and selected data, it makes them Cultist, not legitimate scientists.
According to Grant Reichert "We need to actively ignore global warming for the time being — to get inaction in action. We simply cannot put off procrastinating any longer. Or, as Carbon the Bear would say, 'Only you can’t prevent global warming.'":
Global warming is not a problem we should be worried about when fixing it would take such an incredible investment of money for such a low return on such a distant problem. There are more immediate problems such as AIDS and malaria.
Scientific progress is exponential. There’s no telling what the world of fifty years from now will hold. Presently, we are on the verge of startling breakthroughs in nanotechnology, which will allow us to manipulate the world at its most basic level. After crossing this threshold, nearly anything will be possible.
We’ve already discovered ways to use nanoscopic particles of gold as catalysts to remove carbon monoxide from the environment. Within the next hundred years, we will be able to purge chemicals from our environment with the push of a button, not through economically devastating and largely ineffective treaties.
|
|
