The Post-Bush Regime: A Prognosis

by Richard K. Moore

Global Research, December 27, 2007


In order to understand anything about American political affairs, it is
necessary to have some understanding of who it is that really makes the
decisions behind the scenes, and what their interests are. In this way
we have some hope of identifying the hidden agendas being served by
government actions and programs, and some hope of identifying the
longer-term strategies that are in play.

It turns out—and informed people should already know this—that the U.S.
is essentially owned and managed by a small clique of wealthy
families—the ones who own and control the Federal Reserve. The
Rockefellers are the obvious and well-known members of this clique, but
there are others less well-known, not all American, and some whose
identity remains to this day a carefully guarded secret. We don’t even
know exactly who it is that’s running the show.

Such has been the nature of our ‘democracy’ since 1913, when the
Federal Reserve Act was snuck through Congress during Christmas recess,
by the same folks who funded Woodrow Wilson’s campaign and who became
the private owners of the new all-powerful central bank. The first
major initiative of these folks, the ancestors of our current ruling
clique, was to finance both sides in Europe during World War I, and
then to connive the entrance of the US into the war just in time to
tilt the balance to the side favored by the clique—the same pattern
that later characterized World War II.

From that point forward American policy-making has been firmly in the
hands of the original Federal Reserve clique and its descendents. The
mainstream media is also under the thumb of the same clique, so that
public opinion is never allowed to interfere with fundamental clique
objectives. The media can be used to support sitting Presidents, or to
undermine them, depending on which best enhances those objectives. No
President who has turned on these people has survived long in office,
as we saw most recently in the case of JFK. The tentacles of the clique
reach also into the top echelons of all the Intelligence services and
the Pentagon, and into those influential globalist forums, such as the
WTO, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderbergers.

Bush and the neocons have been mere tools-of-the-day for this clique.
The neocons happened to be promoting a package that appealed to the
clique, that promised to advance some of its objectives. In selecting
the neocons to be the drivers behind a new administration, the clique
was by no means adopting the neocon philosophy, nor were they buying
into the whole PNAC package. They were simply employing a convenient
tool that was aligned tactically with clique interests for the time
being. Any such tool can be discarded whenever its behavior becomes
counter-productive, or when a better tool comes along. There is always
a Plan B in the wings for any tool that might go rogue or go sour.

Bush, who has probably never even read the PNAC agenda, was selected
for entirely different reasons. Knowing that the agenda would be highly
unpopular, the clique decided that defending it logically would be very
difficult, even with complete control over the media. An articulate and
intelligent President would look like a fool if he tried to defend the
insane policies. So, our clique slyly figured, why not put someone up
there who is obviously a fool, right through his whole little soul, so
that the public will believe they are struggling against the
foolishness of one man, and have no understanding of what’s really
going on. Of course Bush, being clueless on all matters apart from
golf, looting, cocaine, and womanizing, would need to be kept far away
from any role in running the White House. Hence the need for Cheney,
the shadow real president, who leaves all the photo ops to Bush, who
stays out of the public eye himself, and who carries the Black
Armageddon Box with him everywhere he goes, something only official
Presidents have done in the past.

This was the project that went operational in the form of Bush’s
initial Presidential campaign. The ducks were all lined up for
launching a major imperialist venture, the preparations for 9/11 were
well underway, and no power on Earth was going to stop the Bush Show.
Of course Bush The Clueless was going to win, no matter how much vote
fixing and media lying was required, or how many Supreme Court Justices
were needed to accomplish the task. As a last resort they wouldn’t have
hesitated to off Gore, one of their own boys, if it was the only way to
open the path for their current man, a tactic they used earlier with
Bobby Kennedy. Of course now that we have Diebold machines, all of this
can be accomplished by a single computer command message, specifying
which candidates are to get which percentage of votes in each precinct.
Exit polls have been abandoned since they provide hard statistical
evidence of the systematic fix.

The neocons have accomplished much for their elite puppeteers, and have
been given in return free reign to loot at will, funneling all those
billions for the Iraq War into their own corporate coffers and
investment portfolios. They for their part have established the
foundations of a fascist state in the US and Canada, secured Iraq’s oil
reserves, built permanent forward mega-bases in Iraq, successfullly
destabilized Iraq and prepared it for balkanization, secured pipeline
routes in Afghanistan, restored the profitable opium trade, and made
progress toward achieving the first-strike capability that will be
needed when the time comes to take on Russia and China. Quite a bundle
of major achievements in a very short time indeed. But to our clique,
the question always is, “What have you done for me lately, Sunshine?”

The neocon intention to bomb Iran was the point where the tool went
sour, and threatened to go rogue. Anyone who thought seriously about
what bombing would lead to knew that an attack would quickly spiral out
of anyone’s control—given the advanced arms that Russia has supplied to
hot-headed Iran, and given the fact that the powder keg would involve a
trigger-happy, nuclear potent, clinically-deranged Israel. Russia and
China would of course be on ultra-high scrambled alert, poised to
intervene with due force if the spiral crossed certain unspecified
lines in the sand. The neocons knew this and the clique knew this. Any
attack on Iran, no matter how well planned, limited, and executed,
would be playing Russian roulette with World War III.

The neocons were ready to take this step, to play this game, and they
were in a very advanced stage in their preparations, of both the
military and the psy-op variety. Quite obviously they were not deterred
by the possibility of all-out global nuclear war. This has nothing to
do with Bush’s pretended belief in Revelations and the ascension of the
elect, but rather with the neocons’ evident belief that they were
‘ready for the big one’, copying a page directly out of Dr.
Strangelove, with the neocons in the role of Jack D. Ripper. Unlike the
demented SAC base commander, however, the neocons were forced to
telegraph their moves, and the clique was not pleased with the
scenario. They knew the first-strike capability was not nearly
ready—and Russian roulette is not a game they ever play. They play only
when they hold all the top cards and own a controlling interest in the
casino.

So the time had come to pull the plug on the neocon tool. It was
surprisingly easy to do. The first step, taken who knows how long ago,
was to put the word discreetly to the Joint Chiefs that the Iran
project is off, regardless of what orders might come from the White
House or the Black Box. This news, of course, was to be kept in the
room, as it surely was. Once the castle was thereby made secretly safe,
it was a trivial matter to plant the seeds that would unravel the whole
gone-sour, rogue-threatening, neocon bandwagon. A simple but
devastating Intelligence announcement, a few whispers to key
Bilderberger players that it was open season on the American contingent
at the next meeting, and various other subtle and quite easy moves. It
takes little, after all, to bring down a house of cards, particularly
one propped up by a weak joker. The clique as usual remains invisible.

Certain elements in the White House know what’s happening by now,
while others seem to still think the neocon agenda is the order of the
day. It seems pretty obvious that Cheney was briefed in advance, and
has some kind of golden parachute in his Xmas stocking. I haven’t heard
a peep from him since we first learned of the clique reversal, when the
Intelligence announcement became public knowledge. Bush is by now
imagining Cheney as a reincarnated Judas, and practicing how he’ll say
“Et tu, Brute?” if the opportunity arises. And yet Bush evidently still
hasn’t caught on that his chip has been turned off, him and that fellow
Gates, both of whom still act as if the tractor is still in gear. I
guess they’ll go down like the fellow in the Monte Python film...“Go
ahead, cut off my other arm. I’ll still beat you.”

What happens next will be ratcheting in gains and preparing a fresh new
story line. That is to say, none of the very impressive (ie, horrific)
achievements of the neocons will be undone, and yet the American people
will be led to believe that the evils are in the past—the same standard
tactic that we saw work so well when Nixon resigned. The media will be
filled with fresh new story lines, along with bright intelligent
confident reassuring empathetic Earth-loving new faces, plus other new
fantasies—and the Bush experience will fade from public memory, along
with last season’s football scores. Such an advantage it is for our
rulers, that we Americans have such tiny memory spans and such limited
powers of independent observation, compared to the rest of the world’s
population. I guess the purpose of the melting pot was to melt away our
basic intuitive judgment.

It’s not quite time for the surprise attack on the Wicked Witches of
the East. Space-based warfare is still in Beta Test. Nor is it
necessary to proceed at the moment with the full unleashing of the
Gestapo, the SS Storm Troopers, concentration camps, forced labor, and
the whole nine yards. The neocons have diligently built the foundations
for all this, both in concrete and in legal precedent, but the project
is for the moment on hold and the neocons off mission. When the time
comes to resume project, that will be perceived as a new response to an
unexpected emergent scenario, and no deferred continuity with the Bush
era will be noticed.

I suggest that we can see the focus of the next US administration by
paying attention to Al Gore. He’s going around preaching the gospel of
climate change, and that is rapidly becoming the new cause celebre for
the ‘international community’. It’s more than a campaign by Gore, we’re
seeing a campaign being supported by the mass media, by the powers that
be. We are clearly being prepared for a ‘new show’, after the ‘Bush
show’, and the ‘new show’ is going to be about carbon taxes and
credits, new energy sources, more efficient cars, biofuels, and all
those other things that are allegedly related to climate change and
peak oil.

In order to clear the way for the new show, it seems pretty clear that
the new administration will begin with some easy political wins, by
rapidly cleaning up some of the obvious messes left by the neocons.
Closing down Guantanamo, and declaring that rendition flights have been
abandoned, would gain a lot of points at no real cost (secret flights
and prisons would undoubtedly continue). Iraq has already been
destabilized and prepared for balkanization, and permanent US bases
have already been built. Another easy win will be for US troops to
withdraw to their bases and the oil fields, for the war to be declared
over, and for Iraq to be split up into ethnic provinces, leaving them
to squabble among themselves. It can all be portrayed in the media as a
‘victory for peace and democracy’.

What then, can we expect from this new show? What consequences are
likely to follow from implementing the kind of policies that Al Gore
and the media have been talking about, around climate change, energy
independence, etc.? What is our ruling clique really trying to
accomplish?

At a general level, it is clear that those kinds of policies do not
involve fundamental changes in how our societies operate. We’ll still
have cars, only they might be a bit more efficient, and we’ll be paying
more for fuel and taxes to operate them. We’ll still be shipping
products from China that we could produce locally, and we’ll still be
depending on long-distance trucking. We’ll still be using agricultural
methods that are highly petroleum-dependent, for tractors, fertilizers,
and pesticides. Research and development of new energy sources will
lead to lots of government subsidies, and it may get us a bit more
energy, but not nearly enough to replace petroleum. As long as our
transport and other infrastructures remain basically unchanged, we
remain unsustainable, dependent on petroleum, and none of the Gore-like
initiatives change the overall energy picture, carbon picture, or
climate picture in any significant way.

In order to begin figuring out what the real agenda is, behind
Gore-like policies, let’s look first at one example: biofuels.
Producing biofuels does give us another energy source, but it also
removes land from food production. As a consequence of the
already-existing biofuels market, market prices for grain and other
potential biofuels are now being driven by energy prices. Global food
prices are therefore rising rapidly, while at the same time
food-production acreage is being reduced. These two things will
directly and drastically increase world hunger and starvation,
particularly in the poorest regions. A Gore-inspired administration
will be promoting an expansion of biofuel programs on a global scale,
and it will be patting itself on the back for its noble oil-saving
deeds.

All of this will be occurring in a context where we are facing a global
food crisis generally. We haven’t seen many headlines on this topic,
but the world is sitting on the brink of a major food crisis. Emergency
stockpiles are at low ebb, production levels are down, crop failures
are up, etc. It’s a very nasty picture even without biofuels.

In this context, the net consequence of a major biofuel agenda comes
down to intentional genocide. In order to provide marginally more fuel
to the over-consuming industrialized nations, untold millions will
starve in the third world, in addition to those untold millions that
are already starving. The marginal energy gain is so small by
comparison, that we must accept that the biofuels agenda is primarily
about genocide. However when we begin reading about new famines
breaking out, perhaps in Brazil where biofuels are now going into
massive production, the headlines will blame it on droughts, or crop
failures, or some other excuse, as they always do. We will meanwhile
feel a ‘green glow’ every time we fill up our Prius with biofuels,
unaware of what damage we are doing. And perhaps we’ll donate to Oxfam,
or adopt some third world child and send them letters.

A Gore agenda is simply genocidal imperialism hiding under a new mask,
a new show. Instead of killing off the Indians by killing their
buffalo, it kills off populations by removing their access to food in
other ways. Once again, ‘they’ must be sacrificed so that ‘our’ way of
life can continue and expand. We might note here that more Iraqis died
under Bill Clinton’s sanctions that have been killed in the current
Iraq war. In Bill Clinton’s time the pattern was invisible genocide,
rather than the more violent Bush variety. Apparently in Hillary
Clinton’s time we are to return to that earlier invisible pattern.

Clearly the consequences of a Gore agenda are genocidal, but one might
question whether that is a primary intended outcome. I’ve been
suggesting that it is, and I think more elaboration is in order on that
point. I haven’t made the case very well yet. I’ve merely presented
some of the evidence and suggested a pattern. In order to get a proper
perspective on this issue, we need to step back a bit, and consider the
bigger picture of the industrialized world vis a vis the third world,
in the face of a broad range of mounting resource shortages—the
strategic perspective of our ruling clique.

It seems very clear that the industrialized nations have no intention
of changing the basic path they are on, or of abandoning capitalism. We
can expect only more industrial growth, more energy consumption,
continued use of energy-intensive agricultural methods, etc. The energy
band-aids of a Gore agenda make no significant difference in this
picture whatever, they simply affirm the intention to proceed with
business as usual.

The only way the industrialized North can continue on this path is by
taking over more and more of the third world’s land, water, and
resources for its own use. As the industrial appetite for resources
continues to grow at a rapid rate, and as our global resources are
increasingly stressed, we are going to see a very rapid expansion of
third world hunger and starvation -- the globalization of African-scale
famines. This is inevitable while the North stays on this basic path,
whether we have Gore-like policies or some other set of policies is of
little consequence.

This ‘inevitability’ of mass die-offs in the third world is well known
to those who run the industrial nations. From the perspective of the
heights of power, the question becomes, “How can we manage these
die-offs so that they cause the least disruption in the global economy,
and so that they don’t arouse too much public outcry?” Of course once
you begin managing die-offs, you are then engaging in genocide, ie,
arranging for particular populations to die in preference to others.

The pattern for the management strategy has been made very clear in
Sub-Saharan Africa, where all those civil wars, genocidal atrocities,
droughts, and famines have been occurring. Not many people realize that
these disasters have been systematically imposed on Africa, by means of
IMF requirements, covert destabilization programs, denial of medical
care, the widespread distribution of automatic weapons, the
manipulations of international banks, the dedication of agricultural
land and water to Northern consumption, and the list goes on. Not only
is Africa being starved to death by market forces, but the process is
being accelerated by covert genocidal interventions.

In Africa we see a full-scale Holocaust, a massive genocide program in
process, or should I say we see it not. For in the media it’s nothing
like that. We read that ‘tribal conflicts have flared up’, but we don’t
hear about the two CIA bombings that were each blamed on the ‘other
side’, and which ignited the fracas, a fracas that could become a civil
war. We read about a famine due to ‘drought’, and we aren’t told that
there would be plenty of water if it weren’t for all the coffee-export
plantations using up the local water. We don’t see genocide, we see
Africans befallen with unfortunate miseries, all due to the vagaries of
Mother Nature.

Thus the pattern of managing die-offs becomes clear. It has been tested
satisfactorily in Africa, and we can expect the proven pattern to be
employed in future. They pick a population that they consider
‘redundant’, they undertake a program of acquiring that population’s
resources, and then to speed up the process of removal they engage in
various covert acts of genocide. In this way the world’s population can
be whittled down piecemeal, and manageably, as the North gradually
requires the utilization of ALL the world’s resources for its own
exclusive use. Unfortunately for the North, even that won’t be enough
to enable industrial growth to continue. The South is being killed off
only that the unsustainable North can continue on its path a wee bit
longer.

Meanwhile, the media in the North paints a picture in which only nature
causes famines, and the role of the North is always to provide aid, to
the extent it can. Concerned viewers are given convenient numbers to
call, so they can dispel their concern with a simple donation that will
‘save a child’, or ‘give a family a goat’. No genocide around here;
we’re the good guys. See no evil, feel just fine. By the way, too bad
about those famines over there.

The Gore-style policies are not just genocidal, they are formidably
genocidal. When they start taking massive amounts of land out of food
production, and bring about a substantial increase in global food
prices, in the face of an already stressed world food situation, they
could bring about in a very short time—one bad harvest season—famine on
a scale we have never seen before. How serious the outcome will be
depends entirely on how aggressively the new administration pursues the
Gore-style agenda. They’ve got genocide down to a science, with tunable
parameters.

Apparently, having field-tested Holocaust tactics in Sub-Saharan
Africa, a decision has been made to go global with the program. For
this purpose, the Gore-style policies have the potential to be the
appropriate Weapon of Mass Destruction, the equivalent in the
starvation game to nukes in the kill-by-fire game. This decision to go
global was evidently made some time ago, no doubt just before Gore was
asked to make An Inconvenient Truth. The film was the first signal of
which way the winds were going to blow, the first preview of the ‘new
show’.

The primary mission of the Hillary administration, under the banners of
‘doing something about climate change and peak oil’, will evidently be
to undertake a massive resource grab in the global South, leading to
the selective and massive elimination of certain populations through
starvation. In other words, the mission is to expand the
starving-Africa model globally, a process that will presumably be
helped along by the usual shadowy suspects in their usual destabilizing
roles.

My big fear with the Bush regime was the likely attack on Iran...or was
it the unleashing of the Gestapo? It was a close race in those dark
days. Now we are on the verge of a regime bent on genocide on a scale
that would put the Nazis to shame. I suggest that we have escaped the
kettle only to fall into the frying pan.

I hope no one out there has any romantic notions about the new
Administration, and I hope everyone realizes that the political process
can never be used to solve our problems; that system is in fact the
heart of our problem. I also hope it is clear to everyone that global
genocide is an inevitable consequence of the continuation of this
insane capitalist system, whether you agree with most of my analysis or
not. And in the end, capitalism can’t last anyway.

Only when you have reached that deep level of hopelessness, where you
see no avenue of escape, can you clear your mind enough to begin to see
where the real problem lies. The real problem lies, my friends, in the
fact that you and I have nothing to say about how our societies are
run. Any one of us has more sense than the people who are running
things, and we certainly have our fellow beings more at heart. Our
problem lies in our own powerlessness, leaving power in the hands of
those who always abuse it, in one way or another, in one age after
another.

Our challenge as a sentient species, and our response if we seek to do
anything about the growth-thru-genocide agenda, is to begin to empower
ourselves, us ordinary people, without reference to the useless
political process. How to pursue our empowerment must be the aim of our
investigations, and pursuing that empowerment must be the point of our
activism.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole
responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of
the Centre for Research on Globalization.

To become a Member of Global Research

The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research
articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are
not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed.
For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms
including commercial internet sites, contact: [email protected]

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available to our readers under the provisions
of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of
political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to
use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must
request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: [email protected]

© Copyright Richard K. Moore, Global Research, 2007

The url address of this article is:
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7693
The Post-Bush Regime: A Prognosis